AJs vs JTs: preflop equity

Over all 1,712,304 boards that can follow this deal, AJs finishes with 68.52% of the pot and JTs with 31.48%.

AJs

68.52%

Wins 67.66%, ties 1.72%

JTs

31.48%

Wins 30.62%, ties 1.72%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

AJs against JTs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for AJs against JTs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
AJs67.6551.71930.62668.515
JTs30.6261.71967.65531.485

This is a contest between two suited hands, AJs and JTs. Sharing a rank is the signature of a dominated hand, since the weaker hand is usually out-kicked when the shared rank shows up.

A lead of 37.04 points is large but not decisive: JTs still takes about 306 of every 1,000 deals. About 1.72% of boards chop the pot, which is why equity sits slightly above the win figure for both hands.

In the ranking of all 169 starting hands, AJs is number 11 and JTs is number 45.

Boards behind the percentages: 20,547,648 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
AJs13,902,000353,0006,293,000
JTs6,293,000353,00013,902,000

Exact total: 12 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

AJs against JTs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
AJs2.1761.4783.2650.460
JTs0.4603.2651.4782.176

The last column is the break-even price: the pot odds a call needs to offer, as a ratio of pot to call.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, AJs' equity runs from 62.26% on monotone flops up to 76.84% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). AJs stays ahead on all five textures.

AJs against JTs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsAJs winsTiesJTs winsAJs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.13866.0851.59732.31866.883
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77176.0981.49222.41076.844
Two-tone46.54366.3371.38432.27967.029
Monotone5.21560.2853.94135.77462.255
Paired17.33371.7232.21626.06172.831

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Each hand has a baseline against a random hand: 65.39% for AJs, 57.53% for JTs. Here the change is +3.13 and -26.05 points.

AJs and JTs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
AJs, all flops68.51565.393+3.1221.04774
AJs, rainbow, ten or higher66.88365.393+1.4901.02279
AJs, rainbow, nine or lower76.84465.393+11.4511.17511
AJs, two-tone67.02965.393+1.6361.02502
AJs, monotone62.25565.393-3.1380.95201
AJs, paired72.83165.393+7.4381.11374
JTs, all flops31.48557.528-26.0430.54730
JTs, rainbow, ten or higher33.11757.528-24.4110.57567
JTs, rainbow, nine or lower23.15657.528-34.3720.40252
JTs, two-tone32.97157.528-24.5570.57313
JTs, monotone37.74557.528-19.7830.65612
JTs, paired27.16957.528-30.3590.47227

Does a shared suit matter?

Every legal deal of AJs against JTs leaves the hands with no suit in common, so the suit split does not apply here.

AJs against JTs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsAJs winsTiesJTs winsAJs equity
Share a suit00.00not possiblenot possiblenot possiblenot possible
No shared suit12100.0067.6551.71930.62668.515

How often this matchup comes up

AJs against JTs is made up of 12 specific-card matchups in one seat order, 0.0007% of the 1,624,350 ordered deals, and 24 counting both seat orders, 0.0015%.

A worked example

With $100 from each side, the $200 pot is split on average as $137.04 for AJs and $62.96 for JTs; the first side gains $37.04 per all-in and the second gives up $37.04.

Over a long run, 1,000 deals split into about 677 for AJs, 306 for JTs and 17 tied.

The same matchup from the other side

JTs against AJs adds nothing new: it is 31.48% for JTs and 68.52% for AJs, the same figures reversed.

AsJs against JhTh is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.

How this was computed

We counted every case. Each suit pattern of the 12 specific AJs against JTs deals meets all 1,712,304 boards, and the better five-card hand wins; a split pot is half a win each. The flop table reads each board under all ten of its three-card flops.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session