AQo vs KJs: preflop equity

The exact count puts AQo at 59.18% and KJs at 40.82% when the two hands see all five board cards.

AQo

59.18%

Wins 58.94%, ties 0.48%

KJs

40.82%

Wins 40.58%, ties 0.48%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

AQo against KJs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for AQo against KJs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
AQo58.9410.48240.57759.182
KJs40.5770.48258.94140.818

We compare an offsuit hand with a suited hand. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

A 18.36 point lead is real, and KJs still takes about 406 of every 1,000 deals outright. The tie share is 0.48%: on those boards the pot is chopped and neither hand wins outright.

The hand ranking puts AQo at 14 and KJs at 20 out of 169 starting hands.

Boards behind the percentages: 82,190,592 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
AQo48,444,000396,00033,350,000
KJs33,350,000396,00048,444,000

The board total is exact, 48 deals at 1,712,304 boards each. Won, tied and lost counts are rounded to the nearest thousand from the five-decimal percentages.

AQo against KJs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
AQo1.4501.6972.4640.690
KJs0.6902.4641.6971.450

In the last column, a pot-to-call ratio at or above the figure makes a call break even or better at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, AQo's equity runs from 56.02% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better up to 73.14% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). AQo stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

AQo against KJs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsAQo winsTiesKJs winsAQo equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.26055.9810.07143.94856.016
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77072.5511.18326.26673.142
Two-tone46.66757.2640.31442.42257.421
Monotone5.21255.3462.39342.26156.543
Paired17.09162.4550.60036.94562.755

Flop types: rainbow means three different suits, two-tone means one suit twice, monotone means one suit three times, paired means a repeated rank.

Compared with a random hand

How much does the opponent matter? Compared with its random-hand 64.43%, AQo changes by -5.25 points, and KJs, from 62.57%, by -21.75.

AQo and KJs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
AQo, all flops59.18264.432-5.2500.91852
AQo, rainbow, ten or higher56.01664.432-8.4160.86938
AQo, rainbow, nine or lower73.14264.432+8.7101.13518
AQo, two-tone57.42164.432-7.0110.89119
AQo, monotone56.54364.432-7.8890.87756
AQo, paired62.75564.432-1.6770.97397
KJs, all flops40.81862.567-21.7490.65239
KJs, rainbow, ten or higher43.98462.567-18.5830.70299
KJs, rainbow, nine or lower26.85862.567-35.7090.42927
KJs, two-tone42.57962.567-19.9880.68053
KJs, monotone43.45762.567-19.1100.69457
KJs, paired37.24562.567-25.3220.59528

Does a shared suit matter?

Split by suits, the deals give AQo 59.72% when the hands overlap in a suit and 58.64% when they do not. AQo does better with a shared suit, by 1.08 points.

AQo against KJs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsAQo winsTiesKJs winsAQo equity
Share a suit2450.0059.4590.52340.01859.721
No shared suit2450.0058.4220.44241.13658.643

How often this matchup comes up

Exactly 48 specific deals fit this matchup in one seat order, which is 0.0030% of 1,624,350; both orders together give 96, or 0.0059%.

A worked example

Worked example: both players commit $100, so $200 sits in the middle. Over every board, AQo's average share is $118.36 (a gain of $18.36) and KJs' is $81.64 (a loss of $18.36).

Over a long run, 1,000 deals split into about 589 for AQo, 406 for KJs and 5 tied.

The same matchup from the other side

KJs against AQo adds nothing new: it is 40.82% for KJs and 59.18% for AQo, the same figures reversed.

Try AsQh against KdJd in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

The page is built from a full enumeration: 1,712,304 boards, every suit pattern of the 48 specific deals, both seven-card hands evaluated. A tie is worth half a win to each hand, and a board is tallied under each of its ten possible flops for the texture rows.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session