AQs vs ATo: preflop equity

In equity, AQs against ATo stands at 74.66% to 25.34%, a gap of 49.32 points.

AQs

74.66%

Wins 71.90%, ties 5.52%

ATo

25.34%

Wins 22.58%, ties 5.52%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

AQs against ATo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for AQs against ATo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
AQs71.9005.51922.58174.660
ATo22.5815.51971.90025.340

The matchup pits a suited hand against an offsuit hand. Sharing a rank is the signature of a dominated hand, since the weaker hand is usually out-kicked when the shared rank shows up.

That is a clear edge, 74.66% to 25.34%, but ATo still wins often enough that one hand proves nothing. 5.52% of boards are ties, so the equity of each hand is its win rate plus half of that.

Place 10 of 169 belongs to AQs and place 19 belongs to ATo in the ranking against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 61,642,944 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
AQs44,321,0003,402,00013,920,000
ATo13,920,0003,402,00044,321,000

Exact total: 36 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

AQs against ATo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
AQs2.9461.3914.4290.339
ATo0.3394.4291.3912.946

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

If you know the kind of flop that came, the numbers shift: AQs holds 83.62% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) and 67.36% on monotone flops. AQs stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

AQs against ATo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsAQs winsTiesATo winsAQs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.17771.0423.12625.83272.605
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77181.0575.12513.81883.620
Two-tone46.52773.6743.44122.88575.394
Monotone5.19265.0264.66930.30567.360
Paired17.33366.24114.72719.03273.605

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 66.21% for AQs and 62.72% for ATo. This opponent changes them by +8.45 and -37.38 points.

AQs and ATo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
AQs, all flops74.66066.209+8.4511.12764
AQs, rainbow, ten or higher72.60566.209+6.3961.09660
AQs, rainbow, nine or lower83.62066.209+17.4111.26297
AQs, two-tone75.39466.209+9.1851.13873
AQs, monotone67.36066.209+1.1511.01738
AQs, paired73.60566.209+7.3961.11171
ATo, all flops25.34062.722-37.3820.40400
ATo, rainbow, ten or higher27.39562.722-35.3270.43677
ATo, rainbow, nine or lower16.38062.722-46.3420.26115
ATo, two-tone24.60662.722-38.1160.39230
ATo, monotone32.64062.722-30.0820.52039
ATo, paired26.39562.722-36.3270.42083

Does a shared suit matter?

Does suit overlap move the numbers? AQs has 74.44% when the hands share a suit and 74.77% when they do not. AQs does better with no shared suit, by 0.33 points.

AQs against ATo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsAQs winsTiesATo winsAQs equity
Share a suit1233.3371.6405.60022.76074.440
No shared suit2466.6772.0305.47822.49274.769

How often this matchup comes up

How often does it happen? 36 of the 1,624,350 ordered deals (0.0022%) are AQs against ATo, and 72 (0.0044%) if either hand may sit in either seat.

A worked example

Try it with money: two players each put in $100 and the whole board runs out every possible way. AQs averages $149.32 from the $200, up $49.32; ATo averages $50.68, down $49.32.

Think in thousands: about 719 of 1,000 go to AQs, about 226 go to ATo, and about 55 are chopped.

The same matchup from the other side

If you came looking for ATo against AQs, the numbers are the same with the hands swapped: 25.34% and 74.66%.

Try AsQs against AhTd in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 36 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session