ATo vs KTo: preflop equity

The exact count puts ATo at 74.17% and KTo at 25.83% when the two hands see all five board cards.

ATo

74.17%

Wins 73.18%, ties 1.99%

KTo

25.83%

Wins 24.83%, ties 1.99%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

ATo against KTo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for ATo against KTo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
ATo73.1781.99324.82974.174
KTo24.8291.99373.17825.826

Each side holds one of the offsuit hands: ATo and KTo. Sharing a rank is the signature of a dominated hand, since the weaker hand is usually out-kicked when the shared rank shows up.

ATo is the clear favorite, though KTo gets there on roughly one board in 4. Of every 100 boards, about 1.99 are split pots, and the equity figures already include them.

By strength against a random hand, ATo holds place 19 of 169 and KTo holds place 33.

Boards behind the percentages: 184,928,832 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
ATo135,327,0003,686,00045,916,000
KTo45,916,0003,686,000135,327,000

The board total is exact, 108 deals at 1,712,304 boards each. Won, tied and lost counts are rounded to the nearest thousand from the five-decimal percentages.

ATo against KTo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
ATo2.8721.3674.0280.348
KTo0.3484.0281.3672.872

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, ATo's equity runs from 68.49% on monotone flops up to 85.73% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). ATo stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

ATo against KTo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsATo winsTiesKTo winsATo equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.27569.5351.42729.03870.249
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77184.0013.46712.53285.734
Two-tone46.47772.5521.86225.58673.483
Monotone5.14467.1532.67130.17668.489
Paired17.33376.6812.24221.07777.802

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Each hand has a baseline against a random hand: 62.72% for ATo, 59.74% for KTo. Here the change is +11.45 and -33.91 points.

ATo and KTo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
ATo, all flops74.17462.722+11.4521.18258
ATo, rainbow, ten or higher70.24962.722+7.5271.12001
ATo, rainbow, nine or lower85.73462.722+23.0121.36689
ATo, two-tone73.48362.722+10.7611.17157
ATo, monotone68.48962.722+5.7671.09195
ATo, paired77.80262.722+15.0801.24043
KTo, all flops25.82659.739-33.9130.43231
KTo, rainbow, ten or higher29.75159.739-29.9880.49802
KTo, rainbow, nine or lower14.26659.739-45.4730.23881
KTo, two-tone26.51759.739-33.2220.44388
KTo, monotone31.51159.739-28.2280.52748
KTo, paired22.19859.739-37.5410.37158

Does a shared suit matter?

Split by suits, the deals give ATo 74.28% when the hands overlap in a suit and 73.82% when they do not. ATo does better with a shared suit, by 0.46 points.

ATo against KTo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsATo winsTiesKTo winsATo equity
Share a suit8477.7873.2672.01824.71574.276
No shared suit2422.2272.8651.90525.23073.818

How often this matchup comes up

Exactly 108 specific deals fit this matchup in one seat order, which is 0.0066% of 1,624,350; both orders together give 216, or 0.0133%.

A worked example

To see what the equity is worth, imagine $100 each in a $200 pot. ATo is worth $148.34 on average (+$48.34); KTo is worth $51.66 (-$48.34).

A thousand deals look like this: ATo takes 732, KTo takes 248, 20 are ties.

The same matchup from the other side

KTo against ATo adds nothing new: it is 25.83% for KTo and 74.17% for ATo, the same figures reversed.

Try AsTh against KdTc in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 108 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session