KQo vs QTs: preflop equity

The exact count puts KQo at 69.56% and QTs at 30.44% when the two hands see all five board cards.

KQo

69.56%

Wins 68.34%, ties 2.44%

QTs

30.44%

Wins 29.22%, ties 2.44%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

KQo against QTs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for KQo against QTs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
KQo68.3422.44029.21869.562
QTs29.2182.44068.34230.438

Here an offsuit hand (KQo) meets a suited hand (QTs). The two hands share a rank, and the one with the better other card dominates: it wins most kicker battles when that shared rank hits.

That is a clear edge, 69.56% to 30.44%, but QTs still wins often enough that one hand proves nothing. 2.44% of boards are ties, so the equity of each hand is its win rate plus half of that.

Place 23 of 169 belongs to KQo and place 34 belongs to QTs in the ranking against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 61,642,944 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
KQo42,128,0001,504,00018,011,000
QTs18,011,0001,504,00042,128,000

The total is exact: 36 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards. The three counts are approximate, worked out from the percentages to five decimals and rounded to the nearest thousand.

KQo against QTs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
KQo2.2851.4633.4230.438
QTs0.4383.4231.4632.285

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

The flop changes the picture. KQo does best on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower), at 80.31%, and worst on monotone flops, at 65.01%. KQo stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

KQo against QTs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsKQo winsTiesQTs winsKQo equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.17767.0562.30330.64168.208
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77179.7971.02219.18180.308
Two-tone46.52766.8411.88331.27667.782
Monotone5.19263.2833.46333.25465.014
Paired17.33370.4724.44525.08372.694

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

The table below sets each hand against its own random-hand baseline: a change of +8.10 points for KQo, from 61.46%, and -29.03 for QTs, from 59.47%.

KQo and QTs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
KQo, all flops69.56261.456+8.1061.13190
KQo, rainbow, ten or higher68.20861.456+6.7521.10987
KQo, rainbow, nine or lower80.30861.456+18.8521.30676
KQo, two-tone67.78261.456+6.3261.10294
KQo, monotone65.01461.456+3.5581.05790
KQo, paired72.69461.456+11.2381.18286
QTs, all flops30.43859.468-29.0300.51184
QTs, rainbow, ten or higher31.79259.468-27.6760.53461
QTs, rainbow, nine or lower19.69259.468-39.7760.33114
QTs, two-tone32.21859.468-27.2500.54177
QTs, monotone34.98659.468-24.4820.58832
QTs, paired27.30659.468-32.1620.45917

Does a shared suit matter?

Does suit overlap move the numbers? KQo has 70.57% when the hands share a suit and 69.06% when they do not. KQo does better with a shared suit, by 1.51 points.

KQo against QTs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsKQo winsTiesQTs winsKQo equity
Share a suit1233.3369.3082.52028.17270.568
No shared suit2466.6767.8592.39929.74269.059

How often this matchup comes up

KQo against QTs is made up of 36 specific-card matchups in one seat order, 0.0022% of the 1,624,350 ordered deals, and 72 counting both seat orders, 0.0044%.

A worked example

A $100 all-in from each player makes a $200 pot, and the exact equity says KQo gets $139.12 of it on average and QTs gets $60.88.

Scaled to 1,000 deals, that is roughly 684 wins for KQo, 292 for QTs and 24 chopped pots.

The same matchup from the other side

Swap the hands and you get QTs with 30.44% against KQo with 69.56%. We keep one page per matchup, with the better-ranked hand first.

Open the calculator with KsQh against QdTd already entered, a deal with no shared suit, and change any card to try your own hand. The matchups after it each swap one hand for a nearby one in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 36 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session