QTs
63.48%
Wins 63.02%, ties 0.92%
64s
36.52%
Wins 36.06%, ties 0.92%
QTs against 64s: the numbers
| Hand | Wins | Ties | Loses | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 63.016 | 0.921 | 36.063 | 63.476 |
| 64s | 36.063 | 0.921 | 63.016 | 36.524 |
Two suited hands meet here: QTs against 64s. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.
The lead is steady rather than large, and the flop still has plenty of say in who wins. Ties are 0.92% of the outcomes here; each tied board gives both hands half the pot.
Ranked by equity against a random hand, QTs is number 34 of the 169 starting hands and 64s is number 138.
| Hand | Boards won, about | Boards tied, about | Boards lost, about |
|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 17,264,000 | 252,000 | 9,880,000 |
| 64s | 9,880,000 | 252,000 | 17,264,000 |
Exact total: 16 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.
| Hand | Equity as odds (to 1) | Wins one deal in | Loses one deal in | Pot odds needed to call (to 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 1.738 | 1.587 | 2.773 | 0.575 |
| 64s | 0.575 | 2.773 | 1.587 | 1.738 |
The final column gives the least the pot must offer for each unit called for a call to break even at this equity.
Who is ahead on which flops
QTs prefers rainbow flops topped by a ten or better, where it holds 70.70%, and likes low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) least, where it holds 37.56%. Low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) favor 64s, the hand that is behind overall.
| Flop | Share of flops | QTs wins | Ties | 64s wins | QTs equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow, ten or higher | 24.595 | 70.480 | 0.442 | 29.078 | 70.701 |
| Rainbow, nine or lower | 6.314 | 37.243 | 0.624 | 62.133 | 37.555 |
| Two-tone | 46.727 | 62.696 | 0.446 | 36.858 | 62.919 |
| Monotone | 5.273 | 58.851 | 3.588 | 37.561 | 60.645 |
| Paired | 17.091 | 63.953 | 2.194 | 33.853 | 65.050 |
Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.
Compared with a random hand
Relative to a random opponent, QTs changes by +4.01 points (baseline 59.47%) and 64s by -4.81 points (baseline 41.33%).
| Case | Equity here | Against a random hand | Change in points | Times the random-hand equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs, all flops | 63.476 | 59.468 | +4.008 | 1.06740 |
| QTs, rainbow, ten or higher | 70.701 | 59.468 | +11.233 | 1.18889 |
| QTs, rainbow, nine or lower | 37.555 | 59.468 | -21.913 | 0.63152 |
| QTs, two-tone | 62.919 | 59.468 | +3.451 | 1.05803 |
| QTs, monotone | 60.645 | 59.468 | +1.177 | 1.01979 |
| QTs, paired | 65.050 | 59.468 | +5.582 | 1.09387 |
| 64s, all flops | 36.524 | 41.333 | -4.809 | 0.88365 |
| 64s, rainbow, ten or higher | 29.299 | 41.333 | -12.034 | 0.70885 |
| 64s, rainbow, nine or lower | 62.445 | 41.333 | +21.112 | 1.51078 |
| 64s, two-tone | 37.081 | 41.333 | -4.252 | 0.89713 |
| 64s, monotone | 39.355 | 41.333 | -1.978 | 0.95214 |
| 64s, paired | 34.950 | 41.333 | -6.383 | 0.84557 |
Does a shared suit matter?
Does suit overlap move the numbers? QTs has 65.84% when the hands share a suit and 62.69% when they do not. QTs does better with a shared suit, by 3.15 points.
| Deals | Specific deals | Share of deals | QTs wins | Ties | 64s wins | QTs equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share a suit | 4 | 25.00 | 65.329 | 1.021 | 33.650 | 65.840 |
| No shared suit | 12 | 75.00 | 62.244 | 0.888 | 36.868 | 62.688 |
How often this matchup comes up
QTs against 64s is made up of 16 specific-card matchups in one seat order, 0.0010% of the 1,624,350 ordered deals, and 32 counting both seat orders, 0.0020%.
A worked example
Put $100 each into a $200 pot and deal every board once: QTs averages $126.96 back, ahead of its $100 by $26.96, while 64s averages $73.04, short of its $100 by $26.96.
Over a long run, 1,000 deals split into about 630 for QTs, 361 for 64s and 9 tied.
The same matchup from the other side
64s against QTs adds nothing new: it is 36.52% for 64s and 63.48% for QTs, the same figures reversed.
Keep exploring
QsTs against 6h4h is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.
How this was computed
Each figure is a complete count over boards. Take the 16 specific deals, group them by suit pattern, deal all 1,712,304 boards against each, and compare the two seven-card hands. Equity counts a tie as half a win; the flop rows use every one of a board's ten flops.
Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.
Bring your own hands to a session
Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.
Book a session