QTs vs 86s: preflop equity

Counting every board, the equity split is 63.74% for QTs and 36.26% for 86s, so QTs leads by 27.48 points.

QTs

63.74%

Wins 63.30%, ties 0.88%

86s

36.26%

Wins 35.82%, ties 0.88%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

QTs against 86s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for QTs against 86s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
QTs63.2960.88235.82263.737
86s35.8220.88263.29636.263

Here suited hands face each other, QTs on one side and 86s on the other. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

The lead is steady rather than large, and the flop still has plenty of say in who wins. Ties are 0.88% of the outcomes here; each tied board gives both hands half the pot.

Place 34 of 169 belongs to QTs and place 110 belongs to 86s in the ranking against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
QTs17,341,000242,0009,814,000
86s9,814,000242,00017,341,000

16 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

QTs against 86s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
QTs1.7581.5802.7920.569
86s0.5692.7921.5801.758

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, QTs' equity runs from 38.77% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) up to 70.81% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better. Watch for low rainbow flops (nine high or lower): on those flops 86s holds the better equity.

QTs against 86s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsQTs winsTies86s winsQTs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher24.59570.5930.42428.98370.805
Rainbow, nine or lower6.31438.5300.48760.98338.774
Two-tone46.72762.9880.40636.60663.191
Monotone5.27359.0263.51537.45960.784
Paired17.09164.1012.17833.72165.190

Flop types: rainbow means three different suits, two-tone means one suit twice, monotone means one suit three times, paired means a repeated rank.

Compared with a random hand

A random hand would give QTs 59.47% and 86s 46.24%. Against each other the change is +4.27 points for QTs and -9.98 for 86s.

QTs and 86s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
QTs, all flops63.73759.468+4.2691.07179
QTs, rainbow, ten or higher70.80559.468+11.3371.19064
QTs, rainbow, nine or lower38.77459.468-20.6940.65201
QTs, two-tone63.19159.468+3.7231.06261
QTs, monotone60.78459.468+1.3161.02213
QTs, paired65.19059.468+5.7221.09622
86s, all flops36.26346.243-9.9800.78418
86s, rainbow, ten or higher29.19546.243-17.0480.63134
86s, rainbow, nine or lower61.22646.243+14.9831.32401
86s, two-tone36.80946.243-9.4340.79599
86s, monotone39.21646.243-7.0270.84804
86s, paired34.81046.243-11.4330.75276

Does a shared suit matter?

The suit split reads 66.16% for QTs with a shared suit and 62.93% without one. QTs does better with a shared suit, by 3.23 points.

QTs against 86s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsQTs winsTies86s winsQTs equity
Share a suit425.0065.6740.97833.34866.163
No shared suit1275.0062.5030.85036.64762.928

How often this matchup comes up

Out of 1,624,350 ways to deal two seats two cards each, 16 are QTs in one seat and 86s in the other (0.0010%); with the seats swapped too, 32 (0.0020%).

A worked example

Worked example: both players commit $100, so $200 sits in the middle. Over every board, QTs' average share is $127.48 (a gain of $27.48) and 86s' is $72.52 (a loss of $27.48).

Think in thousands: about 633 of 1,000 go to QTs, about 358 go to 86s, and about 9 are chopped.

The same matchup from the other side

One page covers both views. From 86s' side the equity is 36.26%, and from QTs' side it is 63.74%.

Try QsTs against 8h6h in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

We counted every case. Each suit pattern of the 16 specific QTs against 86s deals meets all 1,712,304 boards, and the better five-card hand wins; a split pot is half a win each. The flop table reads each board under all ten of its three-card flops.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session