87s vs 64s: preflop equity

If 87s and 64s get all the chips in before the flop, 87s owns 64.31% of the pot in the long run and 64s owns 35.69%.

87s

64.31%

Wins 62.16%, ties 4.31%

64s

35.69%

Wins 33.53%, ties 4.31%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

87s against 64s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for 87s against 64s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
87s62.1604.30633.53464.313
64s33.5344.30662.16035.687

87s meets 64s, and both are suited hands. The two hands share no rank, which makes this a pure matchup of card strength, straight chances and flush chances.

The lead is steady rather than large, and the flop still has plenty of say in who wins. Ties are part of the picture: 4.31% of boards end in a split pot, and each side counts that as half a win.

87s ranks number 100 of 169 starting hands, and 64s ranks number 138, by equity against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
87s17,030,0001,180,0009,187,000
64s9,187,0001,180,00017,030,000

The board total is exact, 16 deals at 1,712,304 boards each. Won, tied and lost counts are rounded to the nearest thousand from the five-decimal percentages.

87s against 64s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
87s1.8021.6092.9820.555
64s0.5552.9821.6091.802

The last column is the break-even price: the pot odds a call needs to offer, as a ratio of pot to call.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, 87s' equity runs from 60.47% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) up to 66.49% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better. 87s stays ahead on all five textures.

87s against 64s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flops87s winsTies64s wins87s equity
Rainbow, ten or higher25.84464.6613.65531.68466.488
Rainbow, nine or lower5.06560.2360.46039.30460.466
Two-tone46.72762.8922.77534.33364.279
Monotone5.27359.1305.12335.74761.692
Paired17.09157.88310.36331.75463.064

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 47.94% for 87s and 41.33% for 64s. This opponent changes them by +16.37 and -5.64 points.

87s and 64s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
87s, all flops64.31347.936+16.3771.34164
87s, rainbow, ten or higher66.48847.936+18.5521.38702
87s, rainbow, nine or lower60.46647.936+12.5301.26139
87s, two-tone64.27947.936+16.3431.34093
87s, monotone61.69247.936+13.7561.28697
87s, paired63.06447.936+15.1281.31559
64s, all flops35.68741.333-5.6460.86340
64s, rainbow, ten or higher33.51241.333-7.8210.81078
64s, rainbow, nine or lower39.53441.333-1.7990.95648
64s, two-tone35.72141.333-5.6120.86422
64s, monotone38.30841.333-3.0250.92681
64s, paired36.93641.333-4.3970.89362

Does a shared suit matter?

Two kinds of deal exist here. In 4 of them the hands share a suit and 87s holds 66.87%. In 12 they do not, and it holds 63.46%. 87s does better with a shared suit, by 3.41 points.

87s against 64s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of deals87s winsTies64s wins87s equity
Share a suit425.0064.5574.62630.81766.870
No shared suit1275.0061.3614.19934.44063.461

How often this matchup comes up

Exactly 16 specific deals fit this matchup in one seat order, which is 0.0010% of 1,624,350; both orders together give 32, or 0.0020%.

A worked example

Take a $200 pot built from $100 each. 87s' equity of 64.31% is worth $128.62, a $28.62 edge, and 64s' 35.69% is worth $71.38, which is $28.62 under its stake.

In 1,000 deals of exactly this matchup, expect about 622 won outright by 87s, about 335 won outright by 64s and about 43 split.

The same matchup from the other side

If you came looking for 64s against 87s, the numbers are the same with the hands swapped: 35.69% and 64.31%.

The calculator link fills in 8s7s against 6h4h, a deal where the two hands share no suit. Change any card to test your own hand. The neighboring matchups below swap one of the two hands for one of similar strength.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 16 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session