A4s vs QJo: preflop equity

Over all 1,712,304 boards that can follow this deal, A4s finishes with 58.65% of the pot and QJo with 41.35%.

A4s

58.65%

Wins 58.41%, ties 0.48%

QJo

41.35%

Wins 41.11%, ties 0.48%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

A4s against QJo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for A4s against QJo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
A4s58.4080.48341.10958.649
QJo41.1090.48358.40841.351

We compare a suited hand with an offsuit hand. Neither hand shares a rank with the other, so this is a contest of high cards, connection and suits.

A 17.30 point lead is real, and QJo still takes about 411 of every 1,000 deals outright. Ties are 0.48% of the outcomes here; each tied board gives both hands half the pot.

A4s ranks number 35 of 169 starting hands, and QJo ranks number 39, by equity against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 82,190,592 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
A4s48,006,000397,00033,788,000
QJo33,788,000397,00048,006,000

Exact total: 48 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

A4s against QJo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
A4s1.4181.7122.4330.705
QJo0.7052.4331.7121.418

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Across the five flop textures A4s' equity moves by 25.14 points, from 50.87% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better to 76.01% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). A4s stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

A4s against QJo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsA4s winsTiesQJo winsA4s equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.98850.8120.11949.06950.872
Rainbow, nine or lower7.04275.4721.07423.45476.009
Two-tone46.66758.1300.31141.55958.285
Monotone5.21254.4072.40243.19155.608
Paired17.09164.0140.63735.34964.332

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

The table below sets each hand against its own random-hand baseline: a change of -0.38 points for A4s, from 59.03%, and -16.79 for QJo, from 58.14%.

A4s and QJo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
A4s, all flops58.64959.034-0.3850.99348
A4s, rainbow, ten or higher50.87259.034-8.1620.86174
A4s, rainbow, nine or lower76.00959.034+16.9751.28755
A4s, two-tone58.28559.034-0.7490.98731
A4s, monotone55.60859.034-3.4260.94197
A4s, paired64.33259.034+5.2981.08974
QJo, all flops41.35158.135-16.7840.71129
QJo, rainbow, ten or higher49.12858.135-9.0070.84507
QJo, rainbow, nine or lower23.99158.135-34.1440.41268
QJo, two-tone41.71558.135-16.4200.71755
QJo, monotone44.39258.135-13.7430.76360
QJo, paired35.66858.135-22.4670.61354

Does a shared suit matter?

The suit split reads 58.30% for A4s with a shared suit and 59.00% without one. A4s does better with no shared suit, by 0.70 points.

A4s against QJo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsA4s winsTiesQJo winsA4s equity
Share a suit2450.0058.0400.52541.43558.302
No shared suit2450.0058.7750.44240.78358.996

How often this matchup comes up

This page stands for 48 specific-card matchups (0.0030% of 1,624,350 ordered deals), or 96 once you count the seats both ways (0.0059%).

A worked example

A $100 all-in from each player makes a $200 pot, and the exact equity says A4s gets $117.30 of it on average and QJo gets $82.70.

Out of 1,000 deals you should see around 584 outright wins for A4s, 411 for QJo, and 5 split pots.

The same matchup from the other side

The reversed view, QJo against A4s, shows 41.35% for QJo and 58.65% for A4s. It is the same count, so it redirects here.

Try As4s against QhJd in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

The page is built from a full enumeration: 1,712,304 boards, every suit pattern of the 48 specific deals, both seven-card hands evaluated. A tie is worth half a win to each hand, and a board is tallied under each of its ten possible flops for the texture rows.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session