AJs vs QTs: preflop equity

In equity, AJs against QTs stands at 60.65% to 39.35%, a gap of 21.30 points.

AJs

60.65%

Wins 60.40%, ties 0.50%

QTs

39.35%

Wins 39.10%, ties 0.50%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

AJs against QTs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for AJs against QTs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
AJs60.3980.50039.10260.648
QTs39.1020.50060.39839.352

Both hands are suited hands: AJs and QTs. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

A 21.30 point lead is real, and QTs still takes about 391 of every 1,000 deals outright. Of every 100 boards, about 0.50 are split pots, and the equity figures already include them.

AJs ranks number 11 of 169 starting hands, and QTs ranks number 34, by equity against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
AJs16,547,000137,00010,713,000
QTs10,713,000137,00016,547,000

The board total is exact, 16 deals at 1,712,304 boards each. Won, tied and lost counts are rounded to the nearest thousand from the five-decimal percentages.

AJs against QTs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
AJs1.5411.6562.5570.649
QTs0.6492.5571.6561.541

The last column is the break-even price: the pot odds a call needs to offer, as a ratio of pot to call.

Who is ahead on which flops

Low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the best for AJs (72.58%); rainbow flops topped by a ten or better are the worst (56.53%). AJs stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

AJs against QTs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsAJs winsTiesQTs winsAJs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.13856.4750.10643.41956.528
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77172.1450.87726.97872.583
Two-tone46.72759.5740.26440.16259.706
Monotone5.27355.9543.40940.63757.658
Paired17.09163.9890.61235.39964.295

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 65.39% for AJs and 59.47% for QTs. This opponent changes them by -4.74 and -20.12 points.

AJs and QTs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
AJs, all flops60.64865.393-4.7450.92744
AJs, rainbow, ten or higher56.52865.393-8.8650.86444
AJs, rainbow, nine or lower72.58365.393+7.1901.10995
AJs, two-tone59.70665.393-5.6870.91303
AJs, monotone57.65865.393-7.7350.88172
AJs, paired64.29565.393-1.0980.98321
QTs, all flops39.35259.468-20.1160.66173
QTs, rainbow, ten or higher43.47259.468-15.9960.73101
QTs, rainbow, nine or lower27.41759.468-32.0510.46104
QTs, two-tone40.29459.468-19.1740.67757
QTs, monotone42.34259.468-17.1260.71201
QTs, paired35.70559.468-23.7630.60041

Does a shared suit matter?

Does suit overlap move the numbers? AJs has 62.88% when the hands share a suit and 59.90% when they do not. AJs does better with a shared suit, by 2.98 points.

AJs against QTs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsAJs winsTiesQTs winsAJs equity
Share a suit425.0062.5890.57736.83462.878
No shared suit1275.0059.6670.47539.85859.904

How often this matchup comes up

The class pair covers 16 combinations of specific cards in a fixed seat order, 0.0010% of 1,624,350, and 32 (0.0020%) in either order.

A worked example

To see what the equity is worth, imagine $100 each in a $200 pot. AJs is worth $121.30 on average (+$21.30); QTs is worth $78.70 (-$21.30).

Out of 1,000 deals you should see around 604 outright wins for AJs, 391 for QTs, and 5 split pots.

The same matchup from the other side

QTs against AJs adds nothing new: it is 39.35% for QTs and 60.65% for AJs, the same figures reversed.

Try AsJs against QhTh in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

The figures are counted, not estimated: 1,712,304 boards for every suit pattern of the 16 specific deals, with both seven-card hands compared each time. Equity gives half a win for a tie. For the flop rows, a board is counted once under each of the ten flops inside it.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session