AQo vs K9s: preflop equity

Before any board card is dealt, AQo holds 60.07% equity against K9s, which leaves K9s with 39.93%.

AQo

60.07%

Wins 59.84%, ties 0.47%

K9s

39.93%

Wins 39.69%, ties 0.47%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

AQo against K9s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for AQo against K9s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
AQo59.8390.46739.69460.072
K9s39.6940.46759.83939.928

One side is an offsuit hand, the other is a suited hand. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

AQo is ahead, but K9s is far from dead: it takes 397 of every 1,000 deals outright. Split pots make up 0.47% of the boards, and both equity figures count them as half a win each.

Among the 169 starting hands, AQo is number 14 and K9s is number 29 by strength against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 82,190,592 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
AQo49,182,000384,00032,625,000
K9s32,625,000384,00049,182,000

48 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

AQo against K9s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
AQo1.5051.6712.5190.665
K9s0.6652.5191.6711.505

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Split by what the flop looks like, AQo peaks at 63.33% on paired flops and bottoms out at 55.97% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). AQo stays ahead on all five textures.

AQo against K9s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsAQo winsTiesK9s winsAQo equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.98862.9040.12036.97662.964
Rainbow, nine or lower7.04255.4561.02443.52055.968
Two-tone46.66758.1850.29541.52058.332
Monotone5.21255.9952.38441.62157.187
Paired17.09163.0300.60836.36263.334

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Against one random hand instead, AQo holds 64.43% and K9s holds 59.99%. Facing each other changes that by -4.36 points for AQo and -20.06 points for K9s.

AQo and K9s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
AQo, all flops60.07264.432-4.3600.93233
AQo, rainbow, ten or higher62.96464.432-1.4680.97722
AQo, rainbow, nine or lower55.96864.432-8.4640.86864
AQo, two-tone58.33264.432-6.1000.90533
AQo, monotone57.18764.432-7.2450.88756
AQo, paired63.33464.432-1.0980.98296
K9s, all flops39.92859.988-20.0600.66560
K9s, rainbow, ten or higher37.03659.988-22.9520.61739
K9s, rainbow, nine or lower44.03259.988-15.9560.73401
K9s, two-tone41.66859.988-18.3200.69461
K9s, monotone42.81359.988-17.1750.71369
K9s, paired36.66659.988-23.3220.61122

Does a shared suit matter?

Two kinds of deal exist here. In 24 of them the hands share a suit and AQo holds 60.65%. In 24 they do not, and it holds 59.50%. AQo does better with a shared suit, by 1.15 points.

AQo against K9s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsAQo winsTiesK9s winsAQo equity
Share a suit2450.0060.3940.50839.09860.648
No shared suit2450.0059.2840.42640.29059.497

How often this matchup comes up

Counting specific cards, AQo against K9s appears in 48 of the 1,624,350 ordered heads-up deals (0.0030%), and in 96 when the seats are swapped too (0.0059%).

A worked example

A $100 all-in from each player makes a $200 pot, and the exact equity says AQo gets $120.14 of it on average and K9s gets $79.86.

A thousand deals look like this: AQo takes 598, K9s takes 397, 5 are ties.

The same matchup from the other side

K9s versus AQo is this same page seen from the other hand: 39.93% for K9s, 60.07% for AQo.

Open the calculator with AsQh against Kd9d already entered, a deal with no shared suit, and change any card to try your own hand. The matchups after it each swap one hand for a nearby one in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 48 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session