ATs vs KJs: preflop equity

The exact count puts ATs at 59.01% and KJs at 40.99% when the two hands see all five board cards.

ATs

59.01%

Wins 58.76%, ties 0.51%

KJs

40.99%

Wins 40.73%, ties 0.51%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

ATs against KJs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for ATs against KJs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
ATs58.7560.50740.73759.010
KJs40.7370.50758.75640.990

Here suited hands face each other, ATs on one side and KJs on the other. The two hands share no rank, which makes this a pure matchup of card strength, straight chances and flush chances.

That is a modest edge, the kind that shows up over many hands and is easy to miss in one. Of every 100 boards, about 0.51 are split pots, and the equity figures already include them.

In the ranking of all 169 starting hands, ATs is number 13 and KJs is number 20.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
ATs16,097,000139,00011,161,000
KJs11,161,000139,00016,097,000

16 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

ATs against KJs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
ATs1.4401.7022.4550.695
KJs0.6952.4551.7021.440

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the best for ATs (74.58%); rainbow flops topped by a ten or better are the worst (53.37%). ATs stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

ATs against KJs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsATs winsTiesKJs winsATs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.13853.3110.11546.57453.369
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77174.1370.89324.97074.583
Two-tone46.72757.7790.27141.95057.914
Monotone5.27354.2813.41342.30655.988
Paired17.09163.1890.60836.20363.493

A rainbow flop shows three suits, a two-tone flop repeats one suit, a monotone flop is a single suit, and a paired flop repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Relative to a random opponent, ATs changes by -5.59 points (baseline 64.60%) and KJs by -21.58 points (baseline 62.57%).

ATs and KJs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
ATs, all flops59.01064.602-5.5920.91344
ATs, rainbow, ten or higher53.36964.602-11.2330.82612
ATs, rainbow, nine or lower74.58364.602+9.9811.15450
ATs, two-tone57.91464.602-6.6880.89647
ATs, monotone55.98864.602-8.6140.86666
ATs, paired63.49364.602-1.1090.98283
KJs, all flops40.99062.567-21.5770.65514
KJs, rainbow, ten or higher46.63162.567-15.9360.74530
KJs, rainbow, nine or lower25.41762.567-37.1500.40624
KJs, two-tone42.08662.567-20.4810.67265
KJs, monotone44.01262.567-18.5550.70344
KJs, paired36.50762.567-26.0600.58349

Does a shared suit matter?

The suit split reads 61.12% for ATs with a shared suit and 58.31% without one. ATs does better with a shared suit, by 2.81 points.

ATs against KJs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsATs winsTiesKJs winsATs equity
Share a suit425.0060.8320.58438.58461.124
No shared suit1275.0058.0640.48141.45558.305

How often this matchup comes up

The class pair covers 16 combinations of specific cards in a fixed seat order, 0.0010% of 1,624,350, and 32 (0.0020%) in either order.

A worked example

Try it with money: two players each put in $100 and the whole board runs out every possible way. ATs averages $118.02 from the $200, up $18.02; KJs averages $81.98, down $18.02.

Think in thousands: about 588 of 1,000 go to ATs, about 407 go to KJs, and about 5 are chopped.

The same matchup from the other side

KJs against ATs adds nothing new: it is 40.99% for KJs and 59.01% for ATs, the same figures reversed.

Try AsTs against KhJh in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 16 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session