KQs vs KJo: preflop equity

Averaged over every possible board, KQs is ahead of KJo by 49.92 points of equity, 74.96% to 25.04%.

KQs

74.96%

Wins 72.27%, ties 5.38%

KJo

25.04%

Wins 22.35%, ties 5.38%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

KQs against KJo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for KQs against KJo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
KQs72.2735.37622.35174.961
KJo22.3515.37672.27325.039

We compare a suited hand with an offsuit hand. Sharing a rank is the signature of a dominated hand, since the weaker hand is usually out-kicked when the shared rank shows up.

KQs is the clear favorite, though KJo gets there on roughly one board in 4. Ties are 5.38% of the outcomes here; each tied board gives both hands half the pot.

Ranked by equity against a random hand, KQs is number 16 of the 169 starting hands and KJo is number 26.

Boards behind the percentages: 61,642,944 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
KQs44,551,0003,314,00013,778,000
KJo13,778,0003,314,00044,551,000

36 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

KQs against KJo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
KQs2.9941.3844.4740.334
KJo0.3344.4741.3842.994

In the last column, a pot-to-call ratio at or above the figure makes a call break even or better at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the best for KQs (85.72%); monotone flops are the worst (67.51%). KQs stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

KQs against KJo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsKQs winsTiesKJo winsKQs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.17770.8163.30825.87672.470
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77183.7873.86212.35185.718
Two-tone46.52774.0803.29122.62975.725
Monotone5.19265.2114.59630.19367.509
Paired17.33366.32514.65019.02573.650

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Relative to a random opponent, KQs changes by +11.56 points (baseline 63.40%) and KJo by -35.53 points (baseline 60.57%).

KQs and KJo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
KQs, all flops74.96163.400+11.5611.18235
KQs, rainbow, ten or higher72.47063.400+9.0701.14306
KQs, rainbow, nine or lower85.71863.400+22.3181.35202
KQs, two-tone75.72563.400+12.3251.19440
KQs, monotone67.50963.400+4.1091.06481
KQs, paired73.65063.400+10.2501.16167
KJo, all flops25.03960.569-35.5300.41340
KJo, rainbow, ten or higher27.53060.569-33.0390.45452
KJo, rainbow, nine or lower14.28260.569-46.2870.23580
KJo, two-tone24.27560.569-36.2940.40078
KJo, monotone32.49160.569-28.0780.53643
KJo, paired26.35060.569-34.2190.43504

Does a shared suit matter?

Suit overlap shows up in the numbers. With a suit in common KQs has 74.78% equity, and with none in common it has 75.05%. KQs does better with no shared suit, by 0.27 points.

KQs against KJo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsKQs winsTiesKJo winsKQs equity
Share a suit1233.3372.0555.45822.48774.784
No shared suit2466.6772.3825.33522.28375.050

How often this matchup comes up

Out of 1,624,350 ways to deal two seats two cards each, 36 are KQs in one seat and KJo in the other (0.0022%); with the seats swapped too, 72 (0.0044%).

A worked example

Take a $200 pot built from $100 each. KQs' equity of 74.96% is worth $149.92, a $49.92 edge, and KJo's 25.04% is worth $50.08, which is $49.92 under its stake.

Run 1,000 deals and the tally comes out near 723 for KQs, 223 for KJo and 54 ties.

The same matchup from the other side

KJo versus KQs is this same page seen from the other hand: 25.04% for KJo, 74.96% for KQs.

The calculator link fills in KsQs against KhJd, a deal where the two hands share no suit. Change any card to test your own hand. The neighboring matchups below swap one of the two hands for one of similar strength.

How this was computed

The page is built from a full enumeration: 1,712,304 boards, every suit pattern of the 36 specific deals, both seven-card hands evaluated. A tie is worth half a win to each hand, and a board is tallied under each of its ten possible flops for the texture rows.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session