KTs vs JTs: preflop equity

In equity, KTs against JTs stands at 69.24% to 30.76%, a gap of 38.48 points.

KTs

69.24%

Wins 67.91%, ties 2.67%

JTs

30.76%

Wins 29.42%, ties 2.67%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

KTs against JTs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for KTs against JTs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
KTs67.9092.66929.42269.244
JTs29.4222.66967.90930.756

KTs and JTs are both suited hands. Because the hands share one rank, the one with the higher kicker is ahead when that rank pairs and the other hand is mostly drawing.

That is a clear edge, 69.24% to 30.76%, but JTs still wins often enough that one hand proves nothing. Ties are part of the picture: 2.67% of boards end in a split pot, and each side counts that as half a win.

Ranked by equity against a random hand, KTs is number 22 of the 169 starting hands and JTs is number 45.

Boards behind the percentages: 20,547,648 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
KTs13,954,000548,0006,046,000
JTs6,046,000548,00013,954,000

12 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

KTs against JTs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
KTs2.2511.4733.3990.444
JTs0.4443.3991.4732.251

In the last column, a pot-to-call ratio at or above the figure makes a call break even or better at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

If you know the kind of flop that came, the numbers shift: KTs holds 77.20% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) and 62.72% on monotone flops. KTs stays ahead on all five textures.

KTs against JTs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsKTs winsTiesJTs winsKTs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.13866.9952.59530.41068.293
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77176.5071.39422.09977.204
Two-tone46.54366.8972.07831.02567.936
Monotone5.21560.4364.55935.00562.715
Paired17.33370.2404.35725.40372.419

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

How much does the opponent matter? Compared with its random-hand 61.79%, KTs changes by +7.45 points, and JTs, from 57.53%, by -26.77.

KTs and JTs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
KTs, all flops69.24461.789+7.4551.12065
KTs, rainbow, ten or higher68.29361.789+6.5041.10526
KTs, rainbow, nine or lower77.20461.789+15.4151.24948
KTs, two-tone67.93661.789+6.1471.09948
KTs, monotone62.71561.789+0.9261.01499
KTs, paired72.41961.789+10.6301.17204
JTs, all flops30.75657.528-26.7720.53463
JTs, rainbow, ten or higher31.70757.528-25.8210.55116
JTs, rainbow, nine or lower22.79657.528-34.7320.39626
JTs, two-tone32.06457.528-25.4640.55736
JTs, monotone37.28557.528-20.2430.64812
JTs, paired27.58157.528-29.9470.47944

Does a shared suit matter?

KTs and JTs never overlap in suit in a legal deal, so the whole matchup sits in the no-shared-suit row.

KTs against JTs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsKTs winsTiesJTs winsKTs equity
Share a suit00.00not possiblenot possiblenot possiblenot possible
No shared suit12100.0067.9092.66929.42269.244

How often this matchup comes up

This page stands for 12 specific-card matchups (0.0007% of 1,624,350 ordered deals), or 24 once you count the seats both ways (0.0015%).

A worked example

To see what the equity is worth, imagine $100 each in a $200 pot. KTs is worth $138.48 on average (+$38.48); JTs is worth $61.52 (-$38.48).

Run 1,000 deals and the tally comes out near 679 for KTs, 294 for JTs and 27 ties.

The same matchup from the other side

JTs versus KTs is this same page seen from the other hand: 30.76% for JTs, 69.24% for KTs.

The calculator link fills in KsTs against JhTh, a deal where the two hands share no suit. Change any card to test your own hand. The neighboring matchups below swap one of the two hands for one of similar strength.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 12 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session