QQ vs A9s: preflop equity

In equity, QQ against A9s stands at 68.28% to 31.72%, a gap of 36.56 points.

QQ

68.28%

Wins 68.08%, ties 0.40%

A9s

31.72%

Wins 31.52%, ties 0.40%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

QQ against A9s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for QQ against A9s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
QQ68.0820.39831.52068.281
A9s31.5200.39868.08231.719

One side is a pocket pair, the other is a suited hand. The pair is ahead of one card and behind the other, so the board decides how that plays out.

A lead of 36.56 points is large but not decisive: A9s still takes about 315 of every 1,000 deals. A split pot comes up on 0.40% of boards, so the wins and the equity differ by half of that.

Ranked by equity against a random hand, QQ is number 3 of the 169 starting hands and A9s is number 18.

Boards behind the percentages: 41,095,296 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
QQ27,978,000164,00012,953,000
A9s12,953,000164,00027,978,000

The total is exact: 24 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards. The three counts are approximate, worked out from the percentages to five decimals and rounded to the nearest thousand.

QQ against A9s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
QQ2.1531.4693.1730.465
A9s0.4653.1731.4692.153

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

QQ prefers low rainbow flops (nine high or lower), where it holds 77.75%, and likes monotone flops least, where it holds 63.63%. QQ stays ahead on all five textures.

QQ against A9s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsQQ winsTiesA9s winsQQ equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.86767.3730.15132.47667.449
Rainbow, nine or lower7.04277.2331.02821.73977.747
Two-tone46.54566.3320.32133.34766.493
Monotone5.21262.4312.40535.16463.634
Paired17.33471.7380.08328.17971.779

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Compared with a random opponent, this matchup shifts QQ from 79.93% by -11.65 points and A9s from 62.78% by -31.06 points.

QQ and A9s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
QQ, all flops68.28179.925-11.6440.85431
QQ, rainbow, ten or higher67.44979.925-12.4760.84390
QQ, rainbow, nine or lower77.74779.925-2.1780.97275
QQ, two-tone66.49379.925-13.4320.83194
QQ, monotone63.63479.925-16.2910.79617
QQ, paired71.77979.925-8.1460.89808
A9s, all flops31.71962.781-31.0620.50523
A9s, rainbow, ten or higher32.55162.781-30.2300.51848
A9s, rainbow, nine or lower22.25362.781-40.5280.35445
A9s, two-tone33.50762.781-29.2740.53371
A9s, monotone36.36662.781-26.4150.57925
A9s, paired28.22162.781-34.5600.44951

Does a shared suit matter?

Looking only at deals where the hands share a suit, QQ has 68.57%; looking only at deals where they do not, 67.99%. QQ does better with a shared suit, by 0.58 points.

QQ against A9s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsQQ winsTiesA9s winsQQ equity
Share a suit1250.0068.3550.43931.20668.574
No shared suit1250.0067.8090.35631.83567.987

How often this matchup comes up

Counting specific cards, QQ against A9s appears in 24 of the 1,624,350 ordered heads-up deals (0.0015%), and in 48 when the seats are swapped too (0.0030%).

A worked example

Worked example: both players commit $100, so $200 sits in the middle. Over every board, QQ's average share is $136.56 (a gain of $36.56) and A9s' is $63.44 (a loss of $36.56).

Over a long run, 1,000 deals split into about 681 for QQ, 315 for A9s and 4 tied.

The same matchup from the other side

Swap the hands and you get A9s with 31.72% against QQ with 68.28%. We keep one page per matchup, with the better-ranked hand first.

Try QsQh against Ad9d in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 24 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session