A9o vs JTs: preflop equity

In equity, A9o against JTs stands at 52.72% to 47.28%, a gap of 5.44 points.

A9o

52.72%

Wins 52.50%, ties 0.44%

JTs

47.28%

Wins 47.06%, ties 0.44%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

A9o against JTs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for A9o against JTs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
A9o52.5000.43647.06452.718
JTs47.0640.43652.50047.282

The first hand is an offsuit hand; the second is a suited hand. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

That is a slim edge: neither hand is far ahead. Split pots make up 0.44% of the boards, and both equity figures count them as half a win each.

In the ranking of all 169 starting hands, A9o is number 25 and JTs is number 45.

Boards behind the percentages: 82,190,592 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
A9o43,150,000358,00038,682,000
JTs38,682,000358,00043,150,000

Exact total: 48 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

A9o against JTs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
A9o1.1151.9052.1250.897
JTs0.8972.1251.9051.115

The final column gives the least the pot must offer for each unit called for a call to break even at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, A9o's equity runs from 48.43% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better up to 67.90% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). The overall edge for A9o hides rainbow flops topped by a ten or better, where JTs comes out in front.

A9o against JTs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsA9o winsTiesJTs winsA9o equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.98848.3570.15051.49348.432
Rainbow, nine or lower7.04267.5430.71131.74667.899
Two-tone46.66750.3020.25749.44150.431
Monotone5.21249.9622.36447.67451.144
Paired17.09158.8960.62440.48059.208

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Relative to a random opponent, A9o changes by -8.05 points (baseline 60.77%) and JTs by -10.25 points (baseline 57.53%).

A9o and JTs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
A9o, all flops52.71860.773-8.0550.86746
A9o, rainbow, ten or higher48.43260.773-12.3410.79693
A9o, rainbow, nine or lower67.89960.773+7.1261.11726
A9o, two-tone50.43160.773-10.3420.82983
A9o, monotone51.14460.773-9.6290.84156
A9o, paired59.20860.773-1.5650.97425
JTs, all flops47.28257.528-10.2460.82190
JTs, rainbow, ten or higher51.56857.528-5.9600.89640
JTs, rainbow, nine or lower32.10157.528-25.4270.55801
JTs, two-tone49.56957.528-7.9590.86165
JTs, monotone48.85657.528-8.6720.84926
JTs, paired40.79257.528-16.7360.70908

Does a shared suit matter?

Of the deals of this matchup, 24 share a suit (A9o at 53.12%) and 24 do not (52.31%). A9o does better with a shared suit, by 0.81 points.

A9o against JTs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsA9o winsTiesJTs winsA9o equity
Share a suit2450.0052.8850.47646.63953.123
No shared suit2450.0052.1170.39547.48852.314

How often this matchup comes up

Exactly 48 specific deals fit this matchup in one seat order, which is 0.0030% of 1,624,350; both orders together give 96, or 0.0059%.

A worked example

Worked example: both players commit $100, so $200 sits in the middle. Over every board, A9o's average share is $105.44 (a gain of $5.44) and JTs' is $94.56 (a loss of $5.44).

Run 1,000 deals and the tally comes out near 525 for A9o, 471 for JTs and 4 ties.

The same matchup from the other side

The reversed view, JTs against A9o, shows 47.28% for JTs and 52.72% for A9o. It is the same count, so it redirects here.

As9h against JdTd is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.

How this was computed

The page is built from a full enumeration: 1,712,304 boards, every suit pattern of the 48 specific deals, both seven-card hands evaluated. A tie is worth half a win to each hand, and a board is tallied under each of its ten possible flops for the texture rows.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session