ATs vs 97s: preflop equity

Over all 1,712,304 boards that can follow this deal, ATs finishes with 62.90% of the pot and 97s with 37.10%.

ATs

62.90%

Wins 62.67%, ties 0.46%

97s

37.10%

Wins 36.87%, ties 0.46%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

ATs against 97s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for ATs against 97s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
ATs62.6700.46236.86862.901
97s36.8680.46262.67037.099

Two suited hands meet here: ATs against 97s. Neither hand shares a rank with the other, so this is a contest of high cards, connection and suits.

ATs is ahead, but 97s is far from dead: it takes 369 of every 1,000 deals outright. Split pots make up 0.46% of the boards, and both equity figures count them as half a win each.

By strength against a random hand, ATs holds place 13 of 169 and 97s holds place 94.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
ATs17,170,000127,00010,101,000
97s10,101,000127,00017,170,000

16 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

ATs against 97s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
ATs1.6951.5962.7120.590
97s0.5902.7121.5961.695

The last column is the break-even price: the pot odds a call needs to offer, as a ratio of pot to call.

Who is ahead on which flops

Rainbow flops topped by a ten or better are the best for ATs (68.97%); low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the worst (40.48%). ATs is the favorite overall but falls behind on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower).

ATs against 97s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsATs winsTies97s winsATs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher24.59568.8770.18730.93668.970
Rainbow, nine or lower6.31440.2730.41959.30840.483
Two-tone46.72762.0610.21637.72362.169
Monotone5.27358.2093.39038.40159.904
Paired17.09165.0550.64134.30465.376

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 64.60% for ATs and 49.12% for 97s. This opponent changes them by -1.70 and -12.02 points.

ATs and 97s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
ATs, all flops62.90164.602-1.7010.97367
ATs, rainbow, ten or higher68.97064.602+4.3681.06761
ATs, rainbow, nine or lower40.48364.602-24.1190.62665
ATs, two-tone62.16964.602-2.4330.96234
ATs, monotone59.90464.602-4.6980.92728
ATs, paired65.37664.602+0.7741.01198
97s, all flops37.09949.118-12.0190.75530
97s, rainbow, ten or higher31.03049.118-18.0880.63174
97s, rainbow, nine or lower59.51749.118+10.3991.21171
97s, two-tone37.83149.118-11.2870.77021
97s, monotone40.09649.118-9.0220.81632
97s, paired34.62449.118-14.4940.70491

Does a shared suit matter?

Of the deals of this matchup, 4 share a suit (ATs at 65.27%) and 12 do not (62.11%). ATs does better with a shared suit, by 3.16 points.

ATs against 97s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsATs winsTies97s winsATs equity
Share a suit425.0065.0050.53634.45965.273
No shared suit1275.0061.8920.43737.67162.111

How often this matchup comes up

ATs against 97s is made up of 16 specific-card matchups in one seat order, 0.0010% of the 1,624,350 ordered deals, and 32 counting both seat orders, 0.0020%.

A worked example

To see what the equity is worth, imagine $100 each in a $200 pot. ATs is worth $125.80 on average (+$25.80); 97s is worth $74.20 (-$25.80).

In 1,000 deals of exactly this matchup, expect about 627 won outright by ATs, about 369 won outright by 97s and about 4 split.

The same matchup from the other side

The reversed view, 97s against ATs, shows 37.10% for 97s and 62.90% for ATs. It is the same count, so it redirects here.

AsTs against 9h7h is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 16 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session