JJ vs AQs: preflop equity

Averaged over every possible board, JJ is ahead of AQs by 8.24 points of equity, 54.12% to 45.88%.

JJ

54.12%

Wins 53.91%, ties 0.42%

AQs

45.88%

Wins 45.67%, ties 0.42%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

JJ against AQs: the numbers

Exact preflop results for JJ against AQs, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
JJ53.9080.41545.67754.115
AQs45.6770.41553.90845.885

JJ, a pocket pair, plays AQs, a suited hand. One hand holds a pair and the other holds two cards that both outrank it, which keeps the equity closer than most people expect.

This is close to even money, with JJ a little ahead. Split pots make up 0.42% of the boards, and both equity figures count them as half a win each.

The hand ranking puts JJ at 4 and AQs at 10 out of 169 starting hands.

Boards behind the percentages: 41,095,296 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
JJ22,154,000171,00018,771,000
AQs18,771,000171,00022,154,000

24 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

JJ against AQs read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
JJ1.1791.8552.1890.848
AQs0.8482.1891.8551.179

The last column is the smallest pot odds, written as a pot-to-call ratio, at which a call breaks even with this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

By flop texture, JJ's equity runs from 48.65% on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better up to 71.24% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower). Watch for rainbow flops topped by a ten or better: on those flops AQs holds the better equity.

JJ against AQs by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsJJ winsTiesAQs winsJJ equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.13848.5960.10351.30148.648
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77170.6441.18728.16971.238
Two-tone46.54551.7510.34047.90951.921
Monotone5.21251.2242.41346.36352.430
Paired17.33460.0950.08739.81860.138

Read the flop types this way: rainbow has three suits, two-tone has two cards of one suit, monotone has three, and paired repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 77.47% for JJ and 66.21% for AQs. This opponent changes them by -23.35 and -20.33 points.

JJ and AQs here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
JJ, all flops54.11577.469-23.3540.69854
JJ, rainbow, ten or higher48.64877.469-28.8210.62797
JJ, rainbow, nine or lower71.23877.469-6.2310.91957
JJ, two-tone51.92177.469-25.5480.67022
JJ, monotone52.43077.469-25.0390.67679
JJ, paired60.13877.469-17.3310.77628
AQs, all flops45.88566.209-20.3240.69303
AQs, rainbow, ten or higher51.35266.209-14.8570.77560
AQs, rainbow, nine or lower28.76266.209-37.4470.43441
AQs, two-tone48.07966.209-18.1300.72617
AQs, monotone47.57066.209-18.6390.71848
AQs, paired39.86266.209-26.3470.60206

Does a shared suit matter?

Split by suits, the deals give JJ 54.27% when the hands overlap in a suit and 53.96% when they do not. JJ does better with a shared suit, by 0.31 points.

JJ against AQs by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsJJ winsTiesAQs winsJJ equity
Share a suit1250.0054.0460.45645.49854.274
No shared suit1250.0053.7690.37545.85653.957

How often this matchup comes up

Out of 1,624,350 ways to deal two seats two cards each, 24 are JJ in one seat and AQs in the other (0.0015%); with the seats swapped too, 48 (0.0030%).

A worked example

Say each player puts $100 in before the flop, making a $200 pot. On average JJ takes back $108.24 of it, which is $8.24 more than it put in, and AQs takes back $91.76, $8.24 less than it put in.

Scaled to 1,000 deals, that is roughly 539 wins for JJ, 457 for AQs and 4 chopped pots.

The same matchup from the other side

Swap the hands and you get AQs with 45.88% against JJ with 54.12%. We keep one page per matchup, with the better-ranked hand first.

JsJh against AdQd is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 24 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session