JTs vs 64s: preflop equity

Over all 1,712,304 boards that can follow this deal, JTs finishes with 64.22% of the pot and 64s with 35.78%.

JTs

64.22%

Wins 63.64%, ties 1.16%

64s

35.78%

Wins 35.20%, ties 1.16%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

JTs against 64s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for JTs against 64s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
JTs63.6411.15935.20064.221
64s35.2001.15963.64135.779

Both hands are suited hands: JTs and 64s. With no overlap in ranks, every card that pairs one hand is a card that does not pair the other.

JTs is ahead, but 64s is far from dead: it takes 352 of every 1,000 deals outright. Ties are 1.16% of the outcomes here; each tied board gives both hands half the pot.

By strength against a random hand, JTs holds place 45 of 169 and 64s holds place 138.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
JTs17,436,000318,0009,644,000
64s9,644,000318,00017,436,000

Exact total: 16 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

JTs against 64s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
JTs1.7951.5712.8410.557
64s0.5572.8411.5711.795

In the last column, a pot-to-call ratio at or above the figure makes a call break even or better at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

The flop changes the picture. JTs does best on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better, at 71.18%, and worst on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower), at 40.65%. On low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) the numbers flip and 64s is the one ahead.

JTs against 64s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsJTs winsTies64s winsJTs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher24.59570.8800.60328.51771.182
Rainbow, nine or lower6.31440.3710.56659.06340.654
Two-tone46.72763.5290.55435.91763.806
Monotone5.27359.4773.65736.86661.306
Paired17.09163.4123.06233.52664.943

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

A random hand would give JTs 57.53% and 64s 41.33%. Against each other the change is +6.69 points for JTs and -5.55 for 64s.

JTs and 64s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
JTs, all flops64.22157.528+6.6931.11634
JTs, rainbow, ten or higher71.18257.528+13.6541.23735
JTs, rainbow, nine or lower40.65457.528-16.8740.70668
JTs, two-tone63.80657.528+6.2781.10913
JTs, monotone61.30657.528+3.7781.06567
JTs, paired64.94357.528+7.4151.12889
64s, all flops35.77941.333-5.5540.86563
64s, rainbow, ten or higher28.81841.333-12.5150.69722
64s, rainbow, nine or lower59.34641.333+18.0131.43580
64s, two-tone36.19441.333-5.1390.87567
64s, monotone38.69441.333-2.6390.93615
64s, paired35.05741.333-6.2760.84816

Does a shared suit matter?

The suit split reads 66.66% for JTs with a shared suit and 63.41% without one. JTs does better with a shared suit, by 3.25 points.

JTs against 64s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsJTs winsTies64s winsJTs equity
Share a suit425.0066.0281.27232.70066.664
No shared suit1275.0062.8451.12236.03363.406

How often this matchup comes up

Exactly 16 specific deals fit this matchup in one seat order, which is 0.0010% of 1,624,350; both orders together give 32, or 0.0020%.

A worked example

With $100 from each side, the $200 pot is split on average as $128.44 for JTs and $71.56 for 64s; the first side gains $28.44 per all-in and the second gives up $28.44.

A thousand deals look like this: JTs takes 636, 64s takes 352, 12 are ties.

The same matchup from the other side

Read it from the other side: 64s against JTs is the same matchup with the numbers swapped, so 64s holds 35.78% and JTs holds 64.22%. That address sends you back to this page.

The calculator link fills in JsTs against 6h4h, a deal where the two hands share no suit. Change any card to test your own hand. The neighboring matchups below swap one of the two hands for one of similar strength.

How this was computed

The figures are counted, not estimated: 1,712,304 boards for every suit pattern of the 16 specific deals, with both seven-card hands compared each time. Equity gives half a win for a tie. For the flop rows, a board is counted once under each of the ten flops inside it.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session