QTs vs QJo: preflop equity

If QJo and QTs get all the chips in before the flop, QJo owns 68.69% of the pot in the long run and QTs owns 31.31%.

QTs

31.31%

Wins 27.44%, ties 7.75%

QJo

68.69%

Wins 64.81%, ties 7.75%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

QTs against QJo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for QTs against QJo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
QTs27.4417.74564.81431.313
QJo64.8147.74527.44168.687

The first hand is a suited hand; the second is an offsuit hand. Because the hands share one rank, the one with the higher kicker is ahead when that rank pairs and the other hand is mostly drawing.

QJo is the clear favorite, though QTs gets there on roughly one board in 3. 7.75% of boards are ties, so the equity of each hand is its win rate plus half of that.

By strength against a random hand, QTs holds place 34 of 169 and QJo holds place 39.

Boards behind the percentages: 61,642,944 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
QTs16,915,0004,774,00039,953,000
QJo39,953,0004,774,00016,915,000

Exact total: 36 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.

QTs against QJo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
QTs0.4563.6441.5432.194
QJo2.1941.5433.6440.456

The final column gives the least the pot must offer for each unit called for a call to break even at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Split by what the flop looks like, QJo peaks at 81.27% on low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) and bottoms out at 63.92% on monotone flops. QJo stays ahead on all five textures, but the swing between them is large, so how the flop looks matters a great deal.

QTs against QJo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsQTs winsTiesQJo winsQTs equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.17728.4486.12365.42931.509
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77116.8843.68479.43218.726
Two-tone46.52729.3785.22965.39331.993
Monotone5.19233.0316.10060.86936.081
Paired17.33323.95318.97857.06933.442

A rainbow flop shows three suits, a two-tone flop repeats one suit, a monotone flop is a single suit, and a paired flop repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Start from the random-hand figures, 59.47% for QTs and 58.14% for QJo. This opponent changes them by -28.16 and +10.55 points.

QTs and QJo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
QTs, all flops31.31359.468-28.1550.52655
QTs, rainbow, ten or higher31.50959.468-27.9590.52985
QTs, rainbow, nine or lower18.72659.468-40.7420.31489
QTs, two-tone31.99359.468-27.4750.53799
QTs, monotone36.08159.468-23.3870.60673
QTs, paired33.44259.468-26.0260.56235
QJo, all flops68.68758.135+10.5521.18151
QJo, rainbow, ten or higher68.49158.135+10.3561.17814
QJo, rainbow, nine or lower81.27458.135+23.1391.39802
QJo, two-tone68.00758.135+9.8721.16981
QJo, monotone63.91958.135+5.7841.09949
QJo, paired66.55858.135+8.4231.14489

Does a shared suit matter?

Two kinds of deal exist here. In 12 of them the hands share a suit and QJo holds 69.34%. In 24 they do not, and it holds 68.36%. QJo does better with a shared suit, by 0.98 points.

QTs against QJo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsQTs winsTiesQJo winsQTs equity
Share a suit1233.3326.7377.85265.41130.663
No shared suit2466.6727.7937.69164.51631.638

How often this matchup comes up

Out of 1,624,350 ways to deal two seats two cards each, 36 are QTs in one seat and QJo in the other (0.0022%); with the seats swapped too, 72 (0.0044%).

A worked example

Put $100 each into a $200 pot and deal every board once: QJo averages $137.38 back, ahead of its $100 by $37.38, while QTs averages $62.62, short of its $100 by $37.38.

Over a long run, 1,000 deals split into about 648 for QJo, 274 for QTs and 78 tied.

The same matchup from the other side

If you came looking for QJo against QTs, the numbers are the same with the hands swapped: 68.69% and 31.31%.

Try QsTs against QhJd in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Each figure is a complete count over boards. Take the 36 specific deals, group them by suit pattern, deal all 1,712,304 boards against each, and compare the two seven-card hands. Equity counts a tie as half a win; the flop rows use every one of a board's ten flops.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session