TT vs QJo: preflop equity

In equity, TT against QJo stands at 55.76% to 44.24%, a gap of 11.52 points.

TT

55.76%

Wins 55.56%, ties 0.39%

QJo

44.24%

Wins 44.05%, ties 0.39%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

TT against QJo: the numbers

Exact preflop results for TT against QJo, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
TT55.5590.39344.04855.756
QJo44.0480.39355.55944.244

TT is a pocket pair and QJo is an offsuit hand. A pair against two higher cards is the classic race: the pair is usually a small favorite or close to even, and each overcard that pairs is a way to take the lead.

The lead is steady rather than large, and the flop still has plenty of say in who wins. Split pots make up 0.39% of the boards, and both equity figures count them as half a win each.

Among the 169 starting hands, TT is number 5 and QJo is number 39 by strength against a random hand.

Boards behind the percentages: 123,285,888 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
TT68,496,000485,00054,305,000
QJo54,305,000485,00068,496,000

72 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards gives the exact total. The won, tied and lost counts are approximations from the five-decimal percentages, rounded to the nearest thousand.

TT against QJo read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
TT1.2601.8002.2700.794
QJo0.7942.2701.8001.260

In the last column, a pot-to-call ratio at or above the figure makes a call break even or better at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the best for TT (74.90%); rainbow flops topped by a ten or better are the worst (47.91%). TT is the favorite overall but falls behind on rainbow flops topped by a ten or better.

TT against QJo by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flopsTT winsTiesQJo winsTT equity
Rainbow, ten or higher23.26047.8400.14452.01647.912
Rainbow, nine or lower7.77174.4080.98124.61174.899
Two-tone46.48554.1350.33945.52654.305
Monotone5.15150.7241.71747.55951.582
Paired17.33362.7230.21837.05962.832

A rainbow flop shows three suits, a two-tone flop repeats one suit, a monotone flop is a single suit, and a paired flop repeats a rank.

Compared with a random hand

The table below sets each hand against its own random-hand baseline: a change of -19.25 points for TT, from 75.01%, and -13.90 for QJo, from 58.14%.

TT and QJo here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
TT, all flops55.75675.012-19.2560.74329
TT, rainbow, ten or higher47.91275.012-27.1000.63872
TT, rainbow, nine or lower74.89975.012-0.1130.99849
TT, two-tone54.30575.012-20.7070.72395
TT, monotone51.58275.012-23.4300.68765
TT, paired62.83275.012-12.1800.83763
QJo, all flops44.24458.135-13.8910.76106
QJo, rainbow, ten or higher52.08858.135-6.0470.89598
QJo, rainbow, nine or lower25.10158.135-33.0340.43177
QJo, two-tone45.69558.135-12.4400.78602
QJo, monotone48.41858.135-9.7170.83285
QJo, paired37.16858.135-20.9670.63934

Does a shared suit matter?

Looking only at deals where the hands share a suit, TT has 55.67%; looking only at deals where they do not, 56.19%. TT does better with no shared suit, by 0.52 points.

TT against QJo by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of dealsTT winsTiesQJo winsTT equity
Share a suit6083.3355.4640.40944.12755.669
No shared suit1216.6756.0330.31543.65256.191

How often this matchup comes up

This page stands for 72 specific-card matchups (0.0044% of 1,624,350 ordered deals), or 144 once you count the seats both ways (0.0089%).

A worked example

A $100 all-in from each player makes a $200 pot, and the exact equity says TT gets $111.52 of it on average and QJo gets $88.48.

Think in thousands: about 556 of 1,000 go to TT, about 440 go to QJo, and about 4 are chopped.

The same matchup from the other side

QJo versus TT is this same page seen from the other hand: 44.24% for QJo, 55.76% for TT.

Try TsTh against QdJc in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 72 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session