87s vs 65s: preflop equity

The exact count puts 87s at 63.28% and 65s at 36.72% when the two hands see all five board cards.

87s

63.28%

Wins 61.13%, ties 4.30%

65s

36.72%

Wins 34.57%, ties 4.30%

Equity counts a tie as half a win. Exact over every board.

87s against 65s: the numbers

Exact preflop results for 87s against 65s, in percent
HandWinsTiesLosesEquity
87s61.1304.29934.57163.279
65s34.5714.29961.13036.721

Each side holds one of the suited hands: 87s and 65s. The two hands share no rank, which makes this a pure matchup of card strength, straight chances and flush chances.

87s is ahead, but 65s is far from dead: it takes 346 of every 1,000 deals outright. 4.30% of boards are ties, so the equity of each hand is its win rate plus half of that.

In the ranking of all 169 starting hands, 87s is number 100 and 65s is number 128.

Boards behind the percentages: 27,396,864 counted in all
HandBoards won, aboutBoards tied, aboutBoards lost, about
87s16,748,0001,178,0009,471,000
65s9,471,0001,178,00016,748,000

The total is exact: 16 specific deals times 1,712,304 boards. The three counts are approximate, worked out from the percentages to five decimals and rounded to the nearest thousand.

87s against 65s read as odds
HandEquity as odds (to 1)Wins one deal inLoses one deal inPot odds needed to call (to 1)
87s1.7231.6362.8930.580
65s0.5802.8931.6361.723

The final column gives the least the pot must offer for each unit called for a call to break even at this equity.

Who is ahead on which flops

Rainbow flops topped by a ten or better are the best for 87s (65.67%); low rainbow flops (nine high or lower) are the worst (57.47%). 87s stays ahead on all five textures.

87s against 65s by flop texture, in percent
FlopShare of flops87s winsTies65s wins87s equity
Rainbow, ten or higher25.84463.8413.65532.50465.669
Rainbow, nine or lower5.06557.2640.41442.32257.471
Two-tone46.72761.8422.76935.38963.227
Monotone5.27358.3155.11536.57060.872
Paired17.09157.09410.35932.54762.274

Rainbow flops have three suits, two-tone flops repeat one suit, monotone flops are all one suit, and paired flops repeat a rank.

Compared with a random hand

Compared with a random opponent, this matchup shifts 87s from 47.94% by +15.34 points and 65s from 43.13% by -6.41 points.

87s and 65s here compared with each against a random hand, in percent
CaseEquity hereAgainst a random handChange in pointsTimes the random-hand equity
87s, all flops63.27947.936+15.3431.32007
87s, rainbow, ten or higher65.66947.936+17.7331.36993
87s, rainbow, nine or lower57.47147.936+9.5351.19891
87s, two-tone63.22747.936+15.2911.31899
87s, monotone60.87247.936+12.9361.26986
87s, paired62.27447.936+14.3381.29911
65s, all flops36.72143.133-6.4120.85134
65s, rainbow, ten or higher34.33143.133-8.8020.79593
65s, rainbow, nine or lower42.52943.133-0.6040.98600
65s, two-tone36.77343.133-6.3600.85255
65s, monotone39.12843.133-4.0050.90715
65s, paired37.72643.133-5.4070.87464

Does a shared suit matter?

Looking only at deals where the hands share a suit, 87s has 65.74%; looking only at deals where they do not, 62.46%. 87s does better with a shared suit, by 3.28 points.

87s against 65s by suit overlap, in percent
DealsSpecific dealsShare of deals87s winsTies65s wins87s equity
Share a suit425.0063.4304.61931.95165.739
No shared suit1275.0060.3634.19335.44462.459

How often this matchup comes up

Out of 1,624,350 ways to deal two seats two cards each, 16 are 87s in one seat and 65s in the other (0.0010%); with the seats swapped too, 32 (0.0020%).

A worked example

Try it with money: two players each put in $100 and the whole board runs out every possible way. 87s averages $126.56 from the $200, up $26.56; 65s averages $73.44, down $26.56.

Scaled to 1,000 deals, that is roughly 611 wins for 87s, 346 for 65s and 43 chopped pots.

The same matchup from the other side

If you came looking for 65s against 87s, the numbers are the same with the hands swapped: 36.72% and 63.28%.

Try 8s7s against 6h5h in the calculator: the hands share no suit, and every card can be changed. The links after it are the closest matchups in the ranking.

How this was computed

Method: exact enumeration. The 16 specific deals are grouped by suit pattern, each is run against all 1,712,304 boards, and both seven-card hands are scored. Equity adds half of every tie, and flop textures are tallied over the ten flops inside each board.

Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.

Bring your own hands to a session

Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.

Book a session