QTs
52.49%
Wins 7.16%, ties 90.67%
QTo
47.51%
Wins 2.17%, ties 90.67%
QTs against QTo: the numbers
| Hand | Wins | Ties | Loses | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 7.158 | 90.669 | 2.173 | 52.492 |
| QTo | 2.173 | 90.669 | 7.158 | 47.508 |
QTs, a suited hand, plays QTo, an offsuit hand. The cards are the same ranks, so any difference in equity comes from suitedness alone.
With only 4.98 points between them, the board decides this matchup far more than the cards in hand. A split pot comes up on 90.67% of boards, so the wins and the equity differ by half of that.
Place 34 of 169 belongs to QTs and place 47 belongs to QTo in the ranking against a random hand.
| Hand | Boards won, about | Boards tied, about | Boards lost, about |
|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 2,942,000 | 37,261,000 | 893,000 |
| QTo | 893,000 | 37,261,000 | 2,942,000 |
Exact total: 24 deals times 1,712,304 boards. The other three counts come from the five-decimal percentages and are rounded to the nearest thousand, so read them as approximate.
| Hand | Equity as odds (to 1) | Wins one deal in | Loses one deal in | Pot odds needed to call (to 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs | 1.105 | 13.970 | 46.019 | 0.905 |
| QTo | 0.905 | 46.019 | 13.970 | 1.105 |
The final column gives the least the pot must offer for each unit called for a call to break even at this equity.
Who is ahead on which flops
Break the boards down by their first three cards and QTs is strongest on two-tone flops (53.28%) and weakest on monotone flops (50.28%). QTs stays ahead on all five textures.
| Flop | Share of flops | QTs wins | Ties | QTo wins | QTs equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow, ten or higher | 23.138 | 3.265 | 96.735 | 0.000 | 51.633 |
| Rainbow, nine or lower | 7.771 | 3.409 | 96.591 | 0.000 | 51.705 |
| Two-tone | 46.363 | 8.829 | 88.901 | 2.270 | 53.280 |
| Monotone | 5.152 | 18.514 | 63.540 | 17.946 | 50.284 |
| Paired | 17.576 | 6.201 | 92.681 | 1.118 | 52.541 |
A rainbow flop shows three suits, a two-tone flop repeats one suit, a monotone flop is a single suit, and a paired flop repeats a rank.
Compared with a random hand
Against one random hand instead, QTs holds 59.47% and QTo holds 57.29%. Facing each other changes that by -6.98 points for QTs and -9.78 points for QTo.
| Case | Equity here | Against a random hand | Change in points | Times the random-hand equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTs, all flops | 52.492 | 59.468 | -6.976 | 0.88269 |
| QTs, rainbow, ten or higher | 51.633 | 59.468 | -7.835 | 0.86825 |
| QTs, rainbow, nine or lower | 51.705 | 59.468 | -7.763 | 0.86946 |
| QTs, two-tone | 53.280 | 59.468 | -6.188 | 0.89594 |
| QTs, monotone | 50.284 | 59.468 | -9.184 | 0.84556 |
| QTs, paired | 52.541 | 59.468 | -6.927 | 0.88352 |
| QTo, all flops | 47.508 | 57.291 | -9.783 | 0.82924 |
| QTo, rainbow, ten or higher | 48.367 | 57.291 | -8.924 | 0.84423 |
| QTo, rainbow, nine or lower | 48.295 | 57.291 | -8.996 | 0.84298 |
| QTo, two-tone | 46.720 | 57.291 | -10.571 | 0.81549 |
| QTo, monotone | 49.716 | 57.291 | -7.575 | 0.86778 |
| QTo, paired | 47.459 | 57.291 | -9.832 | 0.82838 |
Does a shared suit matter?
A shared suit is impossible for this matchup, so QTs' 52.49% is the answer for every suit pattern.
| Deals | Specific deals | Share of deals | QTs wins | Ties | QTo wins | QTs equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share a suit | 0 | 0.00 | not possible | not possible | not possible | not possible |
| No shared suit | 24 | 100.00 | 7.158 | 90.669 | 2.173 | 52.492 |
How often this matchup comes up
You will meet this exact matchup 0.0030% of the time in a random heads-up deal: 48 of 1,624,350, counting either seat order.
A worked example
A $100 all-in from each player makes a $200 pot, and the exact equity says QTs gets $104.98 of it on average and QTo gets $95.02.
Scaled to 1,000 deals, that is roughly 71 wins for QTs, 22 for QTo and 907 chopped pots.
The same matchup from the other side
One page covers both views. From QTo's side the equity is 47.51%, and from QTs' side it is 52.49%.
Keep exploring
QsTs against QhTd is a ready-made deal for the calculator, with no suit in common between the hands. The neighboring matchups below replace one hand with another of similar strength.
How this was computed
Each figure is a complete count over boards. Take the 24 specific deals, group them by suit pattern, deal all 1,712,304 boards against each, and compare the two seven-card hands. Equity counts a tie as half a win; the flop rows use every one of a board's ten flops.
Source: our own exact count from the GeorgeLiPoker poker math library. No outside data is used.
Bring your own hands to a session
Review the spots you actually play against these numbers in a Game Assessment, and leave with a one-page written plan.
Book a session